MediAtlas | AI platform for health data insights

Important information can be hard to bring together

Health organisations manage operational reports, programme records, facility information, and public health documents in separate systems.

Fragmented information

Different sources make it hard to build a consistent view of activity and context.

Service recordsReportsProgramme data

Specialist skills required

Teams often need technical support just to explore data and answer operational questions.

Data requestsSpecialist tools

Time to prepare reporting

Manual aggregation and summarising slow down planning and programme review.

AggregateSummariseFormat

See it in action

Three illustrative screens showing how the product could work. Sample data only.

SCREEN 01

Ask the data

Ask a question in plain language and get a clear answer with the figures, the trend, and the signals worth checking.

Natural-language explorationTrend analysisVerified sources

Health intelligence

Authorised view · Planning team

Last 5 yearsAll regions

PLHM

Ask the data

Which regions are falling behind on childhood immunisation?Ask

Compare hospital waiting timesWhich programmes are off target?Summarise this quarter for the ministry

Measles coverage2024

83%

▲ 13 pts since 2019

Regions on target

2 of 4

On target, 90%+Below target

Records explored

2.4M

+12% this year

Coverage trendNational

201920202021202220232024

Target: 90% by 2026. Dataset: national immunisation register.

Signals to check

Outreach sessions roseWest, +9 pts

Vaccine stock-outsNorth A, 3 reports

Late clinic reports4 clinics

Verify sources

SCREEN 02

Signal radar

Spot unusual patterns in routine reporting and see the related context in one place, flagged for staff review.

Pattern detectionKnowledge integrationStaff review

Signal radar

Pattern flags for staff review · updated daily

Respiratory illness3 new flags

East A · weekly cases12 weeks

412

▲ 38% above usual

Wk 1Wk 4Wk 8Wk 12

Expected rangeFlagged weeks

Flagged districts

East A2.4×

North C1.8×

Central B1.5×

Flags prompt review. They are not diagnoses.

What’s different

Age 0–4Share of cases+61%

Clinic cluster3 nearby facilitiesLocal

Reporting delayCompared with usualNormal

Related context3 sources

Facility bulletin 14Mentions a cluster✓

School calendarTerm started 2 weeks ago✓

Weather advisoryCold spell this month✓

Next step

Ask the planning team to review East A and North C

PLHM

Create briefing Assign

SCREEN 03

Programme scorecard

Track targets across programmes and turn the results into a sourced briefing, with access controlled by role.

Programme monitoringBriefing draftsGoverned access

Programme scorecard

Q3 review · 128 facilities

PLHMAN

Create briefing

TargetsMarker = target

Immunisation83%

Antenatal visits72%

Facility reporting94%

Stock available88%

Facilities reporting

94%

▲ 3 pts

Bed occupancy

78%

OccupiedFree

Average wait 19 min ▼ 2

Briefing draftEvery figure linked

Q3 immunisation: key findings

Key findings5 sources verifiedDone

Risks3 sources verifiedDone

Recommended actionsDraftingDraft

Preview Send for review

Governed accessLogged

Planning teamView and exportRole

AnalystsQuery and compareRole

Sensitive fieldsMasked by defaultRule

Every query and export is recorded.

From approved sources to a reviewed summary

An illustrative workflow for operational and programme information, not clinical decision-making.

Connect sources

Bring approved datasets, reports, and knowledge collections into the platform.

Ask a question

Describe the health or operational question in plain language.

Retrieve information

Identify the right source material and data for the task.

Generate insights

AI helps summarise, compare, and run supported analysis.

Review and act

Authorised staff verify results before using them in planning.

Designed around privacy, context, and accountability

Health information is sensitive. Its use must respect institutional policies, data ownership, and the limits of the available evidence.

These are intended design principles, not claims of completed certification or deployment.

✓Privacy and confidentialityProtect sensitive information with appropriate security and access controls.

✓Data governanceRespect organisational policies, data ownership, and privacy requirements.

✓Source traceabilityHelp users verify the information behind generated insights.

✓Human accountabilityKeep health professionals responsible for consequential decisions.

✓Reliable analysisMake data limits and uncertainty clear to users.

✓Deployment flexibilityMatch hosting and inference options to each institution’s needs.

Information support for health institutions

Four places supported health information can be easier to use.

Hospital operations

Explore service activity, resource use, and performance indicators.

Public health intelligence

Explore reports, programme information, and population health indicators.

Programme monitoring

Review programme data and prepare summaries for monitoring and planning.

Health data analysis

Help non-specialists explore data and frame questions for analytics teams.

Public hospitals and networksGovernment health agenciesProgramme managersHealth information teamsPlanning and analytics departments

MediAtlas is not presented as a diagnostic tool. No clinical validation or live institutional deployment is claimed.

Questions about MediAtlas

What types of health information can MediAtlas explore?

The intended scope includes supported documents and structured datasets. Exact sources and formats will need to be agreed for each institution.

Can it work with reports and structured datasets?

That is a core design direction. Specific integrations and supported formats remain to be confirmed.

How will sensitive information be protected?

Any deployment should be designed around access control, data governance, security requirements, and institutional review.

Does MediAtlas make clinical decisions?

No. It is presented as a health-information exploration and analytical support concept, not an autonomous clinical decision system.

Can public institutions discuss a pilot?

Yes. Contact Oxagon to discuss the institution’s information needs, constraints, and possible next steps.

Build a clearer picture of health data

Tell Oxagon which information and workflows need to improve.

Enquire about MediAtlas