Security teams need context, not just more alerts
Signals are spread across tools, and repetitive triage and manual coordination compete for analyst attention.
Events spread across tools
Related signals are hard to connect when context is fragmented.
Repetitive triage
Analysts repeat enrichment and investigation steps across similar events.
Manual coordination
Response needs careful hand-offs, approvals, and documentation.
See it in action
Three illustrative screens showing how the product could work. Sample data only.
Security command centre
See what AI has already triaged, which incidents are open, and what threat intelligence is matching right now.
Attack story
An agent turns scattered events into a clear story, maps the blast radius, and enriches it with threat intelligence.
Agents and approvals
Decide what each agent may do alone and what must ask first, with every action recorded.
From security data to reviewed response
Five steps from connected data to an audited decision.
Connect security data
Bring in supported security data and events from connected systems.
Add context
Link related events and spot patterns that matter.
Triage and investigate
AI agents analyse alerts, gather evidence, and prepare findings.
Recommend response
Propose next steps or permitted actions within configured policies.
Review and audit
Route sensitive decisions for human approval and keep records.
Automation with clear boundaries
Security automation should reduce risk, not create a new path to uncontrolled action.
Where the concept could help
Four places a coordinated workflow could save analyst time.
Alert triage
Sort and prioritise incoming alerts using available context and configured risk criteria.
Incident investigation
Gather related evidence and summarise findings across connected data sources.
Vulnerability prioritisation
Review vulnerabilities alongside asset context, severity, and threat intelligence.
Response coordination
Coordinate approved tasks and escalations with visible human oversight.
Questions about Oxagon Sentinel
Is Oxagon Sentinel available today?
No availability is claimed. Sentinel is currently presented as a proposed product concept.
Which security tools will it integrate with?
No integrations are confirmed. They would be selected based on the target environment, security requirements, and feasibility.
Can actions require analyst approval?
Yes. Human approval for disruptive or high-impact actions is a core principle of the proposed design.
Will it autonomously contain incidents?
No such capability is claimed. Any future response actions would require explicit scope, testing, permission controls, and governance.
How can an organisation explore the idea?
Contact Oxagon to discuss the operational problem, existing tools, constraints, and a potential discovery process.
Explore a more coordinated security workflow
Discuss the proposed Sentinel concept and the operational problems you want to solve.
Discuss a pilot